|
Updated: 3/2/2006
|
Frequently Asked Questions- BillingClick here for "How does a RHC bill for surgeries?"Click here for "How to bill for laboratory services in a RHC?" How does a RHC bill for the "Welcome to Medicare" Physical? Click here to go to the Texas Assoc. of RHCs FAQClick here to go to the RAC Online FAQ FAQ From Healthcare Business Specialists on Certification Issues What is the best way to get your RHC billing Questions answered? The best way to get your questions answered is to ask the payer and ask in writing. In most cases that would be the Intermediary. Under provisions in Section 903 of the MMA of 2003; if you write your intermediary with the question and the appropriate billing facts - the carrier or intermediary must respond in writing (electronic) with the answer. If you follow that guidance; they can not penalize you or the clinic in any way; however, they could still take the money back if they determine their interpretation was incorrect. Here is the language from the MMA of 2003: "a provider of services or supplier follows the written guidance (which may be transmitted electronically) provided by the Secretary or by a Medicare contractor (as de-fined in section 1889(g)) acting within the scope of the contractor’s contract authority, with respect to the furnishing of items or services and submission of a claim for benefits for such items or services with respect to such provider or supplier; ‘‘(ii) the Secretary determines that the provider of services or supplier has accurately presented the circumstances relating to such items, services, and claim to the contractor in writing; and ‘‘(iii) the guidance was in error; the provider of services or supplier shall not be subject to any penalty or interest under this title or the provisions of title XI insofar as they relate to this title (including interest under a repayment plan under section 1893 or otherwise) relating to the provision of such items or service or such claim if the provider of services or supplier reasonably relied on such guidance. ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed as preventing the recoupment or repayment (without any additional penalty) relating to an overpayment insofar as the overpayment was solely the result of a clerical or technical operational error.’’.EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall only apply to a penalty or interest imposed with respect to guidance provided on or after July 24, 2003." Local Coverage Determination (LCD) Most of your questions regarding billing can be answered if you refer to the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) (On 12/28/2005 Riverbend converted from Local Medical Review Policies (LMRP) related to Rural Health Clinics into a Local Coverage Determination (LCD) and changed some of the language from the previous LMRP.) All rural health clinics that are serviced by Riverbend should review the document by going to the Riverbend website at LCD-4874. If you can not find the answer in the LCD; I would look in the FAQ section of the LCD. It is over 20 pages in a question and answer format. To review the FAQ follow the link to it. Local Coverage Determination (LCD-4874) dated 12/28/2005 FAQ from Riverbend regarding Local Coverage Determination Can a Rural Health Clinic bill for an office visit and a hospital admission on the same day? Riverbend GBA will allow an office visit and a hospital admission in the same day; while other intermediaries may not allow this. In a response to an email in the summer of 2005, Trailblazer in Texas indicated that this was allowable as well. This policy is somewhat contrary to what most professionals who have been working in the Medicare Part B billing system for years are used to (only one visit per day). The Office of Inspector General did take exception to this treatment in the Review of Hutchinson Rural Health Clinic and click here to read the report: Review of the Hutchinson Rural Health Clinics, A-07-00-00118 The best answer on this question is to ask the payer what their policy is on this issue. How does a Rural Health Clinic bill for Hospice patients?RiverbendGBA instructs providers to code ALL Hospice patients with a Condition Code 07 and Riverbend will pay the claim. If you have another intermediary you should check with them on their policy toward hospice billing; however, it will most likely read something like the following: Hospice is never a RHC covered service. If a Hospice patient is treated by a rural health clinic physician for services not related to the patient’s terminal condition; the rural health clinic should include condition code 07 in Form Locators 24 through 30 and the claim should be paid by the RHC intermediary. However, most intermediaries are very broad in their determination of what is attributable to the terminal condition and I would expect to receive a request for additional information before the claim is paid. If the service is an attributable to the patient’s terminal condition it is the responsibility of the Hospice to contractually pay the attending physician as well as the RHC physician. If the RHC physician and the Hospice Attending physician are the same physician; Medicare has recently changed procedures to allow the attending physician to include a modifier and receive Medicare Part B payments for specific Hospice patients. See the Medicare Carriers Manual, Part 3, Chapter IV Claims Review and Adjudication Procedures for the new procedures for billing Medicare Part B. 4175.1 Processing Claims for Attending Physicians Who Treat Hospice Patients.--When a Medicare beneficiary elects hospice coverage he/she may designate an attending physician, not employed by the hospice, in addition to receiving care from hospice-employed physicians. The professional services of a non-hospice affiliated attending physician for the treatment and management of a hospice patient’s terminal illness are not considered "hospice services". These attending physician services are billed to Part B, provided they were not furnished under a payment arrangement with the hospice. The attending physician codes services with the GV modifier "Attending physician not employed or paid under agreement by the patient’s hospice provider" when billing his/her professional services furnished for the treatment and management of a hospice patient’s terminal condition. Make payment to the attending physician or beneficiary, as appropriate, based on the payment and deductible rules applicable to each covered service. When services related to a hospice patient’s terminal condition are furnished under a payment arrangement with the hospice by the designated attending physician, the physician must look to the hospice for payment. In this situation the physicians’ services are hospice services and are billed by the hospice to its intermediary. 4175.2 Services Unrelated to a Hospice Patients Terminal Condition--You may receive claims from physicians and suppliers for services not related to the hospice patient’s terminal condition. These services are coded with the GW modifier "service not related to the hospice patient’s terminal condition." Process services coded with the GW modifier in the normal manner for coverage and payment determinations. If warranted, you may conduct prepayment development or post payment review to validate that services billed with the GW modifier are not related to the patient’s terminal condition. (Note: RHCs use Condition Code 07 to indicate that the services were not related to the terminal diagnosis). Home Care Oversight - QuestionI am unable to find any guidance on the rules of home health oversight codes G0179, G0180, G0181, and G0182. In the past, if the services were provided by the RHC physicians at a time when the RHC was not operational but the physicians were seeing nonRHC patients, it was possible to bill these services to Part B, PGBA carrier. However, now PGBA instructs us to file this service as an integral part of an office visit and to include it with our charges to Riverbend. Have I missed something or are these charges now RHC, even if the work is performed when the RHC is closed or even if the physician is not on RHC duty but is working in the hospital that day.I am unable to get a straight answer from PGBA or Riverbend. There is no reason to keep on logging all this home health if there is no charge allowed for it.
If Home Health Oversight is performed
during non-RHC hours there is no prohibition from billing this to the Part B
carrier and being paid fee for service. The key concepts on this type of
billing are:
1. Document the time spent
reviewing the records and actual time the work was performed.
2. Exclude the cost of the
service from the RHC cost report by adjusting or reclassifying the cost.
3. Bill the Carrier using a
11 (physician office) site of service versus a 72 (rural health clinic).
I have ran the above scenario through
several intermediary officials and they have all agreed that there is not
some special provision on home health that if a clinic is a rural health
clinic it can not bill for home care oversight during non-RHC time.
Skilled Nursing Home - QuestionDo you have any information on SNF visits and as of January 1, 2005 should all be billed to RHC? Are there any guidelines on the number of visits and how often?All nursing home visits are billable to rural health
clinics effective 1/1/2005. (you may choose to bill them to Medicare B
on the Part B fee schedule if you exclude the cost on the cost report). The LMRP for Riverbend says 1 every 60 days for
routine visits at level 1 nursing home and 1 every 30 days for routine
visits at skilled nursing homes. As always medical necessity overrides all
numeric guidelines so visits should be carefully documented.
Since many of our clients are interested in Skilled Nursing
Home and NF visits. The Local Coverage Determination (LCD) from
12/28/2005 specifically addresses this issue as
follows: "A
physician/extender visit to a beneficiary in a skilled SNF bed or a
swing bed is medically necessary on a monthly basis to evaluate the
patient status as it relates to the skilled service. A
physician/extender visit may constitute a medically necessary
face-to-face more often than monthly only if the medical record
supports the necessity of more frequent evaluation. (For the
purposes of medical review, monthly shall mean no less than 21 days
between visits.)
In order for a patient to be in a covered Part A stay in a SNF they
must have a 3 day acute qualifying stay (3 midnights) and then they
can be admitted to a SNF under Pt A IF they meet criteria of having
a skilled service performed at the SNF, i.e. PT, OT, ST, wound
cares, tube feedings, etc. The resident is given a maximum of 100
days in each benefit period, and they only get those 100 days
renewed when they have either not received skilled services for 60
days or they are discharged for 60 days and without any skilled
services being paid for by Pt A. All services must be certified by
their physician at 5 days, 14 days, 30 days, 60 days and 90 days (if
the patient still qualifies for skilled pt A services).
In response to the question
regarding the Medicare Secondary Payer forms required by Medicare;
this is the guidance that CMS provided in April, 2005 regarding this
form. Here are a few facts regarding MSP. Medicare Secondary Payer
(MSP) Summary
You do not have to use the specific
8-page form that Medicare prescribes and can use a shorter
version . - Here is a link to a form designed by one of the
list-serve members that is very good: Medicare
Secondary Consent form
Here
is a written response from CMS regarding the Medicare Secondary
Payer form:
CMS Policy (April, 2005)
Medicare law and regulations require that any entity
that bills Medicare for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries
must determine whether Medicare is the primary payer for those
services. Section 1862(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (the Act)
(42 USC 1395y(b)(6)) requires all entities seeking payment for any
item or service furnished under Part B to complete, on the basis of
information obtained from the individual to whom the item or service
is furnished, the portion of the claim form relating to the
availability of other health insurance. Additionally, 42 CFR
489.20(g) requires that all providers must agree "… to bill other
primary payers before billing Medicare..."
Therefore, any provider, physician, and other
supplier that bills Medicare for services rendered to Medicare
beneficiaries must determine whether or not Medicare is the primary
payer for those services. This is accomplished by asking Medicare
beneficiaries, or their representatives, questions concerning the
beneficiary's MSP status.
While the law and regulations apply to all providers,
physicians, and other suppliers, CMS has issued explicit MSP
information collection requirements for
hospitals
only. You many find these instructions online in the MSP Manual in
chapter 3, section 20.1 and 20.2 at:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/105_msp/msp105index.asp
Although CMS does not have explicit MSP information collection
requirements for other providers, physicians, and other suppliers,
it is in their best interest to collect MSP information as
frequently as possible
to ensure they are filing proper claims. A helpful tool that
may be used to collect MSP information is the "MSP Questionnaire"
found in the MSP manual, Chapter 3, Section 20.2.1, "Admission
Questions to Ask Medicare Beneficiaries." Please keep in mind that
the "MSP Questionnaire" is a model. You may add questions you feel
would be helpful in identifying other payers that may be primary to
Medicare.
If providers, physicians, and other suppliers fail to
file correct and accurate claims with Medicare, Medicare can recover
its conditional payments and, in cases where an entity knowingly
bills incorrectly, pursue civil monetary penalties or damages under
the False Claims Act.
Source: Suzanne Ripley, CMS Here is a response from the NARHC List serve
which is pretty typical of an on site review for MSP.
"We just had a Tri Span Medicare Secondary On Site Review at our
Facility here in Louisiana. They were very clear that the MSP form
was to be completed on each patient for each visit and each question
answered. (paper or electronic is acceptable) However, Tri Span said
no signature is required of the Beneficiary on any document, just
the name of the person who is giving the information. They actually
pulled our files at the hospital and checked for the MSP and did and
education which did include the RHC that is provider based."
Source: NARHC List-Serve These FAQs are from the Riverbend Part A Intermediary website.
1) When I receive my all-inclusive rate of payment from RGBA, do I begin billing UB-92 claims using that rate as my charge?
2) Do I bill Flu/PPV to RGBA on a UB-92 claim form?
3) If I do not have the Direct Data Entry (DDE) system, is there a way I can locate the reason codes indicated on my 201 reports, “Summary of Returned Claims” report?
4) What about the remark codes indicated on my remittance advice from RGBA? Are those codes listed anywhere on the web site?
5) How does an RHC bill if the patient presents for services and does not have a face-to-face encounter with the RHC physician or practitioner?
6) How do I bill for covered injections?
7) If an RHC employs a new provider in the facility, do I need to complete paperwork before I submit claims for that provider?
8) I have several claims on a patient that have been returned numerous times referencing an error in the name indicated on the claim form. How can I be certain I am submitting the correct information regarding the patients name and HIC number?
As an RHC facility, a patient comes in for a face to face encounter leaves and returns that afternoon is the second visit considered a face to face billable encounter?
When preparing the cost report and counting total face-to-face visits, do we count the number of wellness exams performed on Medicare and non-Medicare beneficiaries in the total number of visits.
When a Medicare patient comes in for a yearly physical and also has a valid E & M on the same day, how do we bill the patient?
What to do if your NP or PA Resigns?
We had one of our
mid-levels resign last Friday. What is the grace period for
recruiting a new mid-level before our status is in danger
and how do we report our vacancy to begin with?
Answer - You need to report the loss of a mid-level to the State as soon as possible and start recruiting someone. Document your efforts to find someone and you can apply for a waiver in 90 days if you do not find someone. The State will then grant you one year to find someone if they approve your waiver.
Mark R. Lynn.
|
|
Home About HBS Tools Services 2006 RHC Seminars Cost Reports Workbooks HBS Update Links |